My heart weeps for those poor, poor UCLA law students suffering from the trauma of a horrible racist exam question from UCLA law professor Robert Goldstein. The question was in the form of a hypothetical, asking whether, as a St. Louis, Missouri prosecutor, you would seek to indict Michael Brown’s stepfather for inciting a riot with his incendiary comments following the grand jury decision not to indict the police officer involved in his stepson’s death.
Law students pouted and complained, suggesting that the question was racially insensitive and divisive. Boo hoo , budding new bottom feeding billboard tort snakes. Remind me, the next time I need an attorney, to hire one over 40 years of age who has not been totally PC indoctrinated by our press and politicians and activists.
In addition to forcing the evil professor to apologize, and to promise not to grade the exam answer, believe I’m most peeved that our culture has reached a point where we cannot even discuss major issues of the day. For instance, try to enter into a discussion about the President’s job performance, and you are slammed for being a racist. Or try to calmly outline an argument against gay marriage (an oxymoron by the way) based on a biblical world view in a room of twenty somethings, and see the horrified looks on their faces. Unfortunately, everything in this world is not black and white, not clearly defined, not easy to solve or to reach a middle ground. But today, the labels of racism and bigotry we apply to those with opposing views, and different moral/ethical bases, makes calm discussion nearly impossible.
The situation described above is a perfect example. A politically correct presumption (Brown’s aggrieved stepfather is above the law) cannot be questioned and discussed, even in the formative environment of a college campus. WHAT THE HECK !